617-858-1529
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney
  • Practice Areas
    • Recreational Cannabis
    • Sealing and Expunging
    • Medical Marijuana
    • Operating Under the Influence
    • Assault and Battery
    • Drug Crimes
    • Marijuana Growing, Sales and Possession
    • Search and Seizure
    • Chapter 94C
    • Prescription Drugs and OxyContin
    • Warrants and Wiretaps
    • University Student Defense
    • Restraining Orders
    • Minor in Possession
    • DUI Drugs
    • Field Sobriety Tests
    • Road Block OUI
    • Breathalyzer Tests
  • Areas We Serve
  • Contact
    • Reviews
  • Blog

>Drug activity does not equal “armed and dangerous” SJC says

Posted on April 14, 2009 by Joseph

>

A new case from the Supreme Judicial court was a major victory for defendants arrested as part of street level drug transactions. It basically says that just because a police officer witnesses what appears to be a drug transaction, and is justified in stopping the defendant, this does not necessarily mean that the cop has a right to pat-frisk the suspect for weapons. There must be separate indications that the suspect is armed and dangerous. Commonwealth v. Paul Gomes, 453 Mass. 506 (2009)

I offer kudos to the Supreme Judicial Court for recognizing that guns and drugs do not always go together. In fact, most drug dealers are smart enough to know that firearms charges carry a mandatory one-year sentence, so usually they leave their guns at home. Just because cops and prosecutors claim that criminals behave a certain way, it doesn’t make it so.

Recent Posts

  • Domestic Violence Myth #1 of 4: The Victim can “drop” the case
  • The Floodgates, Opening the Door, and the Confrontation Clause
  • Gun Law Overhaul?
  • Is COVID good for criminal defendants?
  • Student Speech

Archives

  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • April 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2014
  • November 2013
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2011
  • May 2011
  • September 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • September 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009

Arrested? Call Somerville defense attorney Joseph J. Goldberg-Giuliano 617-858-1529

© 2025 J. Goldberg Giuliano

Privacy Policy
Material presented on Attorney Joseph Goldberg-Giuliano's website is intended for information purposes only. It is not intended as professional advice and should not be construed as such.